Kebutuhan pengadaan
barang atau jasa yang berkualitas suatu perusahaan ditentukan oleh supplier yang
baik. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, sebaiknya perusahaan melakukan pemilihan serta
evaluasi terhadap supplier yang telah bekerjasama berdasarkan kriteria yang
telah ditentukan. Tujuannya agar supplier yang bekerjasama bisa bersaing secara
sehat dalam meningkatkan kualitas dan konsistensinya sebagai pemasok terhadap perusahaan. proses penentuan rekomendasi supplier
menggunakan metode Sistem pendukung keputusan multikriteria yang bisa membatu
dalam konsistensi kriteria serta keputusan yang diambil lebih akurat. Pengolahan
kriteria menggunakan metode AHP untuk melihat konsistensi bobot antara
kriteria. Sedangkan perbandingan metode MABAC dan WASPAS digunakan sebagai
pembanding dengan data aktual untuk mengetahui metode yang sesuai dengan studi
kasus ini. Dari hasil penelitian
perbandingan data aktual dengan metode MABAC memiliki kesamaan hasil dari
supplier yang direkomendasikan dibandingkan dengan metode WASPAS.
Peer Review
Jurnal
Jurnal
Laporan Turnitin
Bid, S., & Siddique, G. (2019). Human risk assessment of
Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
(MCDM) methods. Heliyon, 5(6), e01956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01956
Božanić, D. I., Pamučar, D. S., & Karović, S. M. (2016).
Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in
a defensive operation. Tehnika, 71(1), 129– 136. https://doi.org/10.5937/tehnika1601129b
Bozanic, D., Pamucar, D., & Karovic, S. (2016). Use of
the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up
positions. Vojnotehnicki Glasnik, 64(3), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9261
Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharyya, O., Zavadskas, E. K., &
Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Application of WASPAS method as an optimization tool
in non-traditional machining processes. Information Technology and Control, 44(1), 77–88.
https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.44.1.7124
Chakraborty, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J.
(2015). Applications of WASPAS method as a multi-criteria decisionmaking tool. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics
Studies and Research, 49(1), 1–17.
Haldar, A., Banerjee, D., Ray, A., & Ghosh, S. (2012).
An integrated approach for supplier selection. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2087– 2102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.251
Muravev, D., & Mijic, N. (2020). A Novel Integrated
Provider Selection Multicriteria Model: The BWM-MABAC Model. Decision Making:
Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 60–78.
https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003078m
Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the Process
of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024– 1034.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317
Tundo, T., & Kurniawan, D. (2019). Implementation of the
Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment Method in Determining the Best Rice
for Serabi Cake Making. IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development),
8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2019.08107
UmaDevi, K., Elango, C., & Rajesh, R. (2012). Vendor
selection using AHP. Procedia Engineering, 38, 1946–1949.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.237
Wang, J., Wei, G., Wei, C., & Wei, Y. (2019). MABAC
method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair
fuzzy environment. Defence Technology, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.019
Xue-Guo, X., Shi, H., Li-Jun, Z., & Hu-Chen, L. (2019).
Green supplier evaluation and selection with an extended MABAC method under the heterogeneous information environment.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236616
Yusnaeni, W., Marlina, Hayuningtyas, R. Y., & Sari, R.
(2021). Laporan Akhir-Comparison AHPMABAC
And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recomendations.