The Employee Promotion Base On Specification Job’s Performance Using: MCDM, AHP, And ELECTRE Method

research
  • 08 Jul
  • 2020

The Employee Promotion Base On Specification Job’s Performance Using: MCDM, AHP, And ELECTRE Method

The process of promotion required in every company. To perpetrating the promotion of position in company is required of job assessment objectively so this result will give proving truly. In reality the success of company affected to whom will lead the  company because the assessment specifically is giving real evidence concerning been perpetrated. Thus, it required some various assessment criteria for specification working performance which is reflected to well-skillful of each personal to be promoted for position based on the expectation in the future. The assessment of specification job’s performance uses ELECTRE Method. It uses seven elected specifications of job’s performance that collaborated to Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) between Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and ELECTRE as preference data of analysis for specification job’s performance of promoting position. The result found  from the level by using Electre method to promote some position by using the specification of job’s performance consecutively: First ranking by the value 9,60 for K5, the Second have 5.97 for K11, the third have 5,92 for K12, the forth have 3,89 for K14, the fifth have 3,83 for K15, the sixth have 3,47 for K15, the seventh have 2,40 for K7, the eighth have 1,12 for K19, the nineth have 0,88 for K6, the tenth have 0,32 for K17, the eleventh have 0,12 for K9,  from the twelfth to the twenty-second rank or the last rank are not accepted, because they are negative weight.

Unduhan

 

REFERENSI

[1] R. A.j, M. Abu, U. Amir, and Z. M.R, “Risk Assessment of Dry Bulk

Cargo Operations Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,”

ICICTM, pp. 146–159, 2016.

[2] M. A. Putri and W. F. Mahmudy, “Optimization of analytic hierarchy

process using genetic algorithm for selecting tutoring agencies in

Kampung Inggris Pare,” ICACSIS, pp. 227–232, 2017.

[3] S. V V, V. A. Shah, and M. M. Lokhande, “Material Selection for

Semiconductor Switching Devices in Electric Vehicles using Analytic

Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Method,” IEEE, 2016.

[4] R. Fatchurrahman, H. Putra, I. Joyokusumo, M. H. Habib, I. Imawati,

and S. P. Hadi, “Light sensor selection of Wi-MoLS (wireless modern

light sensor) based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP),” IEEE, pp.

152–155, 2016.

[5] R. D. Rakhman, A. N. Hidayanto, I. C. Hapsari, P. I. Sandhyaduhita,

and I. Budi, “Applying analytic hierarchy process for measuring

knowledge management readiness in government institutions,” ICITSI,

2017.

[6] S. Hamali, R. Puji, N. Suci, A. Fitri, and F. Arga, “Using Analytic

Hierarchy Process and Decision Tree for a Production Decision

Making,” IEEE, pp. 329–332, 2016.

[7] K. Makkasau, “Penggunaan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (

AHP ) Dalam Penentuan Prioritas Program Kesehatan ( Studi Kasus

Program Promosi Kesehatan ),” J@TI Undip, vol. VII, no. 2, pp. 105–

112, 2012.

[8] Saefudin and W. Sri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penilaian

Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process

(AHP) Pada RSUD Serang,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–37, 2013.

[9] S. K. Sehra, Y. S. Brar, and N. Kaur, “Multi Criteria Decision Making

Approach for Selecting Effort Estimation Model,” Int. J. Comput.

Appl., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2012.

[10] J. Kittur, S. Vijaykumar, V. P. Bellubbi, P. Vishal, and M. G. Shankara,

“Comparison of different MCDM techniques used to evaluate optimal

generation,” IEEE, no. 1, pp. 172–177, 2016.

[11] G. Zhao and S. Yang, “IT Service Incident Management Model

Decision Based on ELECTRE III,” ICIM, vol. 1, pp. 514–517, 2013.

[12] J. M. Fernandes, S. P. Rodrigues, and L. A. Costa, “Comparing AHP

and ELECTRE i for prioritizing software requirements,” IEEE, 2015.

[13] S. Persada and B. Pekanharu, “Pengaruh Promosi Jabatan Terhadap

Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Tasma Puja Di Pekanbaru,” Menara Ilmu,

vol. XI, no. 76, pp. 15–28, 2017.

[14] Tsyganok and Andriichuk, “Usage of Scales With Different Number of

Grades for Pair Comparisons in Decision Support Systems,” Ijahp, vol.

8, no. 1, pp. 112–130, 2016.

[15] S. Meesawad, S. Prapawat, and O. Wongwirat, “Choosing Industrial

Wireless Sensor bu Using Analytic Hierarchy Process,” IEEE, pp. 6–

10, 2016.

[16] R. V. Vargas, “Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) To Select

And Prioritize Projects In A Portofolio,” PMI Glob. Congr., vol. 32,

no. 3, pp. 1–22, 2010.