Informatics Journal Penerapan Metode TOPSIS & SAW Dalam Pemilihan Destinasi Wisata Di Jawa Timur

Tanggal

2020-04-01

Penulis

Abstraksi

This research was conducted to test the application of the Technique Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method and the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method in the decision-making process of choosing tourist destinations in East Java. This research is motivated by the problems faced
by the Jakarta Backpacker Community who often have difficulty in making choices about tourist destinations to be visited in East Java. The criteria used in this study are cost, destination, meeting point, trip length and facilities obtained. The results of this study indicate that The TOPSIS method and the SAW Method can be used for the decision-making process in the selection of tourist destinations in East Java, with the results of Explore Baluran and Menjangan being the most recommended choices as the primary choice. Besides, it is also known that there is a match between the TOPSIS and SAW methods, with the calculation results using the TOPSIS method that is 0.64 and the calculation using the SAW method is 0.86 as the highest calculated value. So as such, these two methods can be stated equally well used in the process of determining tourist destinations in East Java. However, this applies only to the highest value, because for the order of two and so on, the results of calculations on these two methods show differences in rank.

Kata Kunci: tourist destinations, topsis method, saw method

URI
https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/INFORMAL/issue/view/947

Bidang ilmu
Sistem Informasi

References

[1] Indonesia.go.id, “Jawa Timur,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://indonesia.go.id/province/jawa-timur.
[2] E. Suryowati, “Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Jatim Lampaui Nasional Berkat Pariwisata,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.jawapos.com.
[3] V. Dimyati, “Unggul Bidang Pariwisata, Deretan Daerah Ini Dianugerahi Penghargaan,” 2019. [Online]. Available: www.inews.id.
[4] BPS, “Kunjungan Wisman ke Jawa Timur melalui Juanda pada Juli 2019 Naik Sebesar 8,61 persen,” Surabaya, 2019.
[5] A. Triyudanto, “Pengertian Backpaker,” 2019. [Online]. Available: www.backpackerindonesia.com.
[6] R. A. Prakoso and Djunaidi, “Komparasi Metode SAW dan TOPSIS untuk Menentukan Prioritas Perbaikan Jalan,” J. Tek. Elektro, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 8–11, 2016.
[7] M. A. Mude, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Pada Kasus UMKM,” J. Ilm. Ilk., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 76–
81, 2016.
[8] J. A. D. Guterres, “Pemanfaatan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Sebagai Media Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Bantuan Rumah Layak Huni,” Pros. SINTAK 2017, pp. 51–56, 2017.
[9] A. B. Paksi, E. Utami, and Henderi, “Penerapan SAW-TOPSIS Dalam Analisis Rasio Keuangan Untuk Menunjang Keputusan Berinvestasi Saham,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed. 2017, pp. 19–24, 2017.
[10] L. N. Ariyana, Renna Yanwastika; Nurnawati, Erna Kumalasari; El Suffa, “Kombinasi Metode TOPSIS dan SAW Dalam Mendukung Keputusan Seleksi Kelayakan Proposal Penelitian Dosen,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Apl. Sains Teknol. 2018, no. September, pp. 141–150, 2018.
[11] A. A. Azhari, A. Najib, and T. Informasi, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Pada Penerimaan Siswa Praktek Kerja Lapangan,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf. 2018, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2018.
[12] Fatkhurrochman and D. Astuti, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS Dan SAW Dalam Penentuan Penerima
Bantuan Pengembangan Rumah Masyarakat Kurang Mampu,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed. 2018, pp.
67–72, 2018.
[13] H. Wibowo S, “MADM-Tool : Aplikasi Uji Sensitivitas Untuk Model MADM Menggunakan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS,” Semin. Nas. Apl. Teknol. Inf., vol. 0, no. 0, 2010.
[14] C. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, A State of the Art
Survey. 1981.
[15] A. Saleh, R. E. Sari, and H. Kurniawan, “Metode Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Menentukan Kualitas Kulit Ular Untuk Kerajinan Tangan (Studi Kasus : CV . Asia Exotica Medan),” Semin. Nas. Inform.,
pp. 18–23, 2014.
[16] D. Nofriansyah and S. Akba, Konsep Data Mining Vs Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015.
[17] E. A. Riyanto and T. Haryanti, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Teller Pooling Terbaik Pada PT. BCA, Tbk. Dengan Motode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting),” J. Pilar Nusa Mandiri, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 128–135,
2017.