Comparison Rangking Aplikasi Animasi Berbasis Pembelajaran dengan Metode Promethee

Comparison Rangking Aplikasi Animasi Berbasis Pembelajaran dengan Metode Promethee

• By Akmaludin, Akmaludin; Badrul, Mohammad;
• Sertifikat Hak Cipta
• 133
• 1-18

The selection of animation applications provides an excellent overview of measurements, although it provides difficulty in the measurement process as well as cyclomatic complexity analysis, Region set, and Matrix method. With the method of Preference Ranking Organization for Enrichment Evaluation (promethee) can be done to determine the selection of some of the best animation applications, of course, have the same rules that are to be used by all of the users who ranged from nine to a twelve years old. Promethee is a derivative of Multicriteria Decision Making, but the techniques used for the selection process are very different. Promethee uses basic techniques similar to Multi-criteria Decision Making, but for the technique of continuation is clearly different, Promethee emphasizes selection techniques with the concept of outranging based on certain parameters that are partial in the phase of Leaving Flow and Entering Flow while merging at the Net Flow stage called Promethee -II. The results obtained through the Promethee method are featured through the ranking of an outranking method with the highest weights obtained by animation-1 the result is 0.3; followed by second rating of outranking animation-3 the result is -0.1; and the latest of outranking with animation-2 the result is -0,2.
 

• Katakunci MCDM, Outranking, Promethee, Selection
• URL https://zenodo.org/record/3614115#.XiZqlG5uLIU
• Penerbit ,

REFERENSI

Akmaludin. 2013. Analisis Perancangan Animasi Interaktif Pembelajaran Anatomi Otak Manusia Tingkat Sekolah Menengah Pertama. 10: 1–11.
 
Akmaludin A, Suryanto S. 2016. Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Notebook Berbasis Teknologi dengan Metode Multycriteria Decision Making (MCDM). Bina Insa. Ict J. 3: 329– 340.
 
Brands JP. 2005. Promethee Methods: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis State of The Art Surveys. Manage. Sci. 31: 643–656.
 
Brans JP and Vincke Ph. 1985. A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The Promethee Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). J. Chem. Inf. Model. 31: 647–656.
 
Chiou HK, Tzeng GH, Cheng DC. 2005. Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach. Omega 33: 223–234.
 
Chybowski L, Twardochleb M, Wiśnicki B. 2016. Odlučivanje na temelju multikriterijske analize značajnosti komponenti u kompleksnom pomorskom sustavu. Naše more 63: 264–270.
 
Datta S. 2010. Comparative Study on Application of Utility Concept and Vikor Method for Vendor Selection. AIMS Int. Conf. Value-based Manag. 1: 614–622.
 
Deshmukh SC. 2013. Preference Ranking Organization Method Of Enrichment Evaluation (Promethee). Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent. 2: 28–34.
 
Jati H. 2016. Quality Ranking of E-Government Websites – Quality Ranking of E-Government Websites – Promethee II Approach. Bina Insa. Ict J. 1: 1–7.
 
Mazumdar A. 2009. Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making ( MCDM ) Approaches on Teachers ’ Performance Evaluation and Appraisal Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making ( MCDM ) Approaches on Teachers ’ Performance Evaluation and Appraisal. India: National Institute Of Technology Rourkela. 1-40 p.

Saaty TL. 1990. How to Make a Decision The AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1: 9–28.
 
Vaidya, OS. Kumar S. 2006. Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal of Operational Research. Sci. Res. 4: 1–29.
 
Yildirim, BF and Emrah Ö. 2014. Evaluating Potential Freight Villages in Istanbul Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques. J. Logist. Manag. 3: 1–10