Multycriteria Decision Making For Notebook Selections Dengan Pendekatan Algebra Matrix

Multycriteria Decision Making For Notebook Selections Dengan Pendekatan Algebra Matrix

• By Akmaludin, Akmaludin;
• Jurnal Nasional Tidak Terakreditasi
• 135
• 171-177

Advances in computer technology is now proven to have changed the life style of working, so that workers do not sit in place but it can do the work anywhere and anytime, because computer technology support to be able to work in mobile. As a worker with high mobility, of course, need a tool such as atablet or a notebook, to be able to help handle any job. The main concern of the workers is to choose a notebook that suits their needs and tailored to the devices required in accordance with the Notebook function, because it affects the cost to be incurred in the purchase of products according to their needs. To help overcome this problem, then there is one solution that can serve as solutions that make up the academic hierarchy model is used to solve the problem of qualitative and quantitative Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) with Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach through Matrix Algebra, while supporting applications to prove results of mathematical analysis is the application of Expert Choice. With both this measure, we can compare the results of calculations obtained by application of Expert Choice mathematically, especially to prove the value of the resulting eigenvector both mathematically and with the Expert Choice application gives the same value. Testing the consistency of the Consistency Ratio (CR) gives an acceptable value according to the rules Saaty should be less than 0.1. For the final selection of the value notebook synthesize generate sequential priority values as follows 0.299 for Acer Espire 3820T, 0.273 for Lenovo Centre Think Edge, 0.224 for Asus K42JC, and 0.207 for HP Probook 4430S.

• Katakunci Notebook Selection, Matrix Algebra,Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Expert Choice.
• URL https://zenodo.org/record/2620954#.XiVQGm5uLIU
• Penerbit Jurnal Teknik Komputer AMIK BSI, Jakarta DKI Jakarta

REFERENSI

[1] Ampuh H., Rika. A multi Criteria approach to designing the celluler manufacturingsystem. Jurnal    TeknikIndustri UniversitasKristen Petra Vol. 7 No.1 p. 41-42. 2005.

[2] Ferdy. Improving the Faculty Selection Process in Higher  Education: A Case for the Analytic HierarchyProcess. Para 1-2.(access date  4 Juli 2009). 2008.

[3] http:// www.expertchoice.com/ academic-program/ free-trial   (diakses  tanggal 26 Desember 2010).

[4] Istijanto. Aplikasi praktis riset  pemasaran. PT.Gramedia pustakautama. Jakarta. 2009.

[5] Ishizaka, A and Labib, A..  Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and Limitations. orInsight,University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, United Kingdom 22(4), p. 201±220, 2009. 2009

[6] Ishizaka, A and Nemery,P. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and software. First published Jhones Weley and Sons Ltd. 2013.

[7] Mora, M. Analisis sensitivitas dan pengaruhnya terhadap urutan prioritas dalam metode analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Medan. Skripsi: Departemen matematika FMIPA-USU-Medan. 2009.

[8] Teknomo, Kardi. PenggunaanAnalytic   Hierarchy    Proscess  dalammenganalisafaktor-faktor yangmempengaruhi pemilihan Moda kekampus. Jurnal Dimensi Teknik SipilUniversitas Kristen  Petra Vol 1.p. 32. 1999.

[9]    Saaty, TL. The  Analytic  Hierarchical Process. McGraw-Hill.NewYork. 1980.

[10]  Saaty, TL. Fundamentals of  Decision Making  and  Priority  Theory  with  the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Wadsword.RWS. 1994.

[11]  Saaty, TL. The Analytic   Hierachy Process, What  it  is  and  How  it  Used.Journal of Mathematical Modelling  Vol.9 No. 3-5 p. 161-176. 1987.

[12] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Cetakan ke delapan. Bandung. Penerbit Alfabeta. 2001.