Pemilihan Situs Media Online Terhadap Kebutuhan End User dengan Pendekatan Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)

Pemilihan Situs Media Online Terhadap Kebutuhan End User dengan Pendekatan Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)

• By Akmaludin, Akmaludin;
• Jurnal Nasional Tidak Terakreditasi
• 163
• 117-125

Wireless Internet usage is now a major requirement virtual world , even the role of information and communication technology to support the advancement of the use of internet facilities . All forms of life in the media business online communication is needed at all , because the information needs to be a necessity for business users and players. Lines of communication can be done in various ways , one of which can use the online media , such as e -books , e - magazines , newspapers online through the websites of online media . There are so many online media sites which are known among the better-known as seconds , tempo , republika . To analyze online media sites to the needs of the user , takes an objective measurement methodology that can be known empirically . The methodology used using Multi Criteria Decision Making approach ( MCDM ) . In Analytic Hierarchical Process ( AHP ) to know a lot of approaches to decision making. MCDM approach of choice in this paper on the grounds will be applied using the Expert Choice . Advantages of this application is more precise analysis results used directly to prove the MCDM approach . The main criteria used include interfacing , simplicity , quality , satisfaction , and benefits , each criterion has sub- criteria as detailed analysis . The Acquisition of the analysis conducted on the three sites mentioned above with MCDM approach and a kind to using Expert Choice application by the end of the following synthezise Media such as, republika online with a priority value of 0.476 , followed by the second and subsequent online media due to the sequential priority value is 0.293 and 0.231 . The results obtained have the same priority value analysis done with matrix algebra approach by mathematical concepts.

• Katakunci Online media sites , Multi creitera decision making , Analytic hierarchical process
• URL https://ejournal.nusamandiri.ac.id/index.php/pilar/article/view/469
• Penerbit ,

REFERENSI

Alonso JA, Lamata, MT. Consistency in Analytic Hierarchical Process: A new Aproach. World Scientific Publishing Company: International journal of uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Base System. Vol. 14, No. 4, (2006), pages 445-459.
 
Coulter, Elizabeth D., Coakley, J, Sessions, J. 2012. The analytic hierarchical process: The tutorial for use in prioritizing forest Road investments to minimize environmental effects: International journal of forest engineering. Montana, USA. Pp 51-69.

Coulter, Elizabeth D., Coakley, J, Sessions, J. 2012. The analytic hierarchical process: The tutorial for use in prioritizing forest Road investments to minimize environmental effects: International journal of forest engineering. Montana, USA. Pp 5169.
 
Giliams, S, Raymakers, D, Muys, B, Vans Orshoven, J. 2005. Comparing multicriteria decision methods to extend a geographical information system on afforestation: Computer and electronics agriculture. Pages 142-158.
 
Ishizaka, Allesio, Namery Philippe. 2013. A multy criteria groups decision frame work for partner grouping when sharing facilities. Groups Decision and Negotiation. Portmouth Business School-UK. Pages 1-28.
 
Kamal M.Al-Subhi Al-Harbi . 2001. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 19, Issue 1, January 2001, Pages 19-27. Saaty, Thomas L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchical process: International Journal survices sciences Vol. 1 No.1 2008. Pages 83-98.
 
Saaty, Thomas L. 2003. European Journal of  Operational Research, Volume 145, Issue 1, 16 February 2003, Pages 85-91.
 
Saaty, L. Thomas. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchical Process. McGrow-Hill. Newyork. 
 
Tomić,V.,Marinković, Z.Janošević. D., 2011. Promethee method implementation with multi criteria decisions.. Mechanical Engineering Faculty, University of Niš, A. Medvedeva 14, Niš, Serbia, Mechanical Engineering Vol. 9, No 2, 2011, pp. 193–202.
 
Kadarsah, Suryadi, dan Ramdani. 2002. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Suatu Wacana Struktural Idealisasi dan Implementasi Konsep Pengambilan Keputusan, Bandung .PT Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
 
Wayan, R. Susila, Ernawati, Munadi. 2007. Aplication of analytic hierarchical process on prioritizing research proposal. Informatika pertanian Vol. 16. No. 2-2007. Pages 983-984.