Pemilihan e-Megazine Terhadap Kebutuhan dan Keinginan Readership dengan Menggunakan Analytic Hierarchical Process

research
  • 20 Jan
  • 2020

Pemilihan e-Megazine Terhadap Kebutuhan dan Keinginan Readership dengan Menggunakan Analytic Hierarchical Process

Used of the Internet technology superbly proven to not give huge benefits to users, both in terms of deployment and exchange of information, entertainment, free ware software, even to the readings in various forms especially a lot of readings that can be obtained through online channels by the internet without having to purchase in the form of free as well be articles, newspapers, books, and magazines are all in electronic form and can be obtained by the internet. Until recently published magazine in print already behind, because so many turned to the magazine in electronic or digital form is called the e-magazine. With the existence of an intermediate stage in the form of an e-magazine needs assessment of the readership to choose the best performance of any e-magazine published, even many technologies that can support progress towards processing features such as e-magazine like 3D Thumbnails, Podcasts, and RSS. Assessment of the e-magazine readership seen from the goal, multicriteria, and alternative, while the method used is the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP). The process of analysis set forth in the acquisition phase synthesize the results of alternative priority e-magazine is e-the largest environmental gain with the value of 0.488 points, followed by RSC studio with acquisition value 0.284, and the smallest synthesize the results obtained e-magazine Aksarayana the value 0.229. While the results of the ranking criteria biggest readership wants and needs is the ease with criteria further value 0.270 0.235 interface with value, quality value 0.179, satisfaction with the value of 0.175, and the smallest is the benefit criteria with a value of 0.142.

Unduhan

 

REFERENSI

Armadyah Amborowati. 2004. Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Perumahan Dengan Metode AHP Menggunakan Expert Choice, STMIK AMIKOM Yogyakarta
 
Etzioni, Amitai, Mixed Scaning : A thirh Approach to Decision Making, Public Adminitrasion Review, 1987 Lindblom, C.E, The policy Making Process, Englewood Clifts, N.J. Prentice Hall, 1968
 
Indra Idris. 2009. Kajian Dampak Kredit Usaha Rakyat, Deputi Bidang Pengkajian Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM
 
Latifah, Siti. 2005. “Prinsip – prinsip dasar Analytical Hierarchy Process”. Jurnal Studi Kasus Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Sumatera Utara (USU), Medan
 
Mulyono, Sri. 1996. Teori Pengambilan Keputusan. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
 
S.Triwulandari, 2009. Pemilihan Pemasok Cooper Rod Menggunakan Metode ANP ,  Jurnal J@ti Undip Vol IV, No 3.
 
Saaty, T.L. 1987. Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 32:2737. 
 
Supranto. J. 1992. Teknik Sampling untuk survei dan eksperimen. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Susila, W dan Munadi, Ernawati. 2007. “Penggunaan Analytic Hierarchy Process Untuk Penyusunan Prioritas Proposal Penelitian”, Jurnal Informatika Pertanian Vol. 16, No. 2. Departemen Pertanian. 
 
Turban. 2005.Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems (Sistem pendukung
keputusan dan system cerdas) Jilid 1, AndiOffset, Yogyakarta.
 
Vanany, iwan. Aplikasi Anlytic Network Process (ANP) Pada Perancangan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja , Jurnal Teknik Industri Vol 5, 1 Juni 2003: 50-62