Teknik Penyeleksian Keputusan Menggunakan Analytic Hierarchical Process pada Proyek Portofolio

research
  • 20 Jan
  • 2020

Teknik Penyeleksian Keputusan Menggunakan Analytic Hierarchical Process pada Proyek Portofolio

Completion of decision making is using of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to reap the differences of thought, so that was born many approaches. The Approach is an arising from the processing and understanding the data that is inserted into the pairwise matrix. Basic understanding of the comparison is on interdisciplinary science arises is what creating a lot of new ideas. Among of them there were created mathematically logical processes spawned a new approach called Multycriteria Analysis (MCA) where more emphasis on the numerical value generated and transitive relationship. More and more thinking MCA approach which only emphasizes the acquisition process on a numeric value then evolve used for decision making in every problems on the selection of each phenomenon, thus was born a new approach known as Multycriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Of the various problems that arise with the concept of MCDA turns, looks very fundamental difference is how the acquisition of thought used in the MCDA approach to the acquisition of data that is processed, see the data processing turns out there is a single data processing and data processing that there are plural. From this side it turns out there is a clear difference on a much different approach with the approach of Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). MCDM approach turned out to be able to represent on the data processing both single data or data compound. AHP with MCDM approach aligned and devoted to the application called Expert Choice. From some of the above approaches are applied to the method of AHP are the result of the decision equation obtained.

Unduhan

 

REFERENSI

Coulter, ED, Coakley, J, and Sessions, J. 2012. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Tutorial for Use in Prioritizing Forest Road Investments to Minimize Environmental Effects. International Journal of Forest Engineering. Oregon State University College Forests. P-p 55-69. Institute for Logistics and Service Management FOM University of Applied Sciences Essen Leimkugelstraße 6, 45141 Essen, Germany. P-p 1-8. Ishizaka, Alessio and Labib, Ashraf. 2009. Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and Limitations, ORInsight, 22(4),P-p. 201–220.  Portland Street, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, United Kingdom. Ishizaka, Alessio and Labib, Ashraf. 2011. Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice:
Benefits and Limitations. ORInsight, 22(4), P-p. 201–220. Kordi, Maryam. 2008. Master’s Thesis in Geomatics: Comparison of fuzzy and crip analytic hurarchy process methods for special multicriteria decision analysis in GIS. University of Gavle: department of technology and build environment. Ramanathan, R. 2001. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment: Journal of Environmental Management. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research Santosh Nagar, Goregaon (East) Mumbai, 400 065, India. P-p 27-35. Saaty, TL, 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2001. Katz Graduate School of Business,University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. P-p 83-98. Tomic, V, Marinkovic, Z, Janosevic, D. 2011. Promethee Method Implementation with Multi-Criteria Decisions. Facta Universitatic. Mechanical Engineering Vol. 9 No. 2 , 2011, P-p 193-202 Zimmer, S.,  Klumpp, M., and Abidi, H. 1991. Industry Project Evaluation with the Analytic Hierarchy Process.